Lithium 101


There are three main sources of lithium globally: brines, pegmatites and clays. Around 51% of current production is from lithium brines with the remaining 49% from pegmatites. There is potential for lithium-bearing clays as a lithium source, but there has been no commercial production as of yet.


Adsorption is an ion exchange process where a specific sorbent (adsorption medium) selectively adsorbs a specific material. In the case of Wealth’s Atacama project, the sorbent will target lithium, leaving the original brine largely intact and available for pumping back into the salar, which maintains water levels and implies only a modest production footprint (buildings and support infrastructure).

High-grade Li compounds are mostly processed from salar brines in Argentina, Chile, and Bolivia due to low operation costs. However, Li separation from salar brines is typically slow (i.e., a few months), since it is based on solar evaporation of the brines in ponds and requires multiple purification steps.

Solvent extraction processes and solid-phase extraction processes are being evaluated for lithium recovery from brines. However, Wealth Minerals’ team has determined that solvent extraction is not the best methodology for lithium recovery, due to the chemicals involved, implied cost and waste product management issues. The low-cost recovery of lithium from brines demands the use of selective high-capacity reusable sorbents.


Exploration begins at the surface. Pit sampling is inexpensive and provides information on lithium grade at the surface of the salar. It does not provide assurances that grade with continue at depth. Pit sampling is good for initial-stage exploration, providing an impetus to explore further.

After surface sampling, exploration turns to the sub-surface through geophysics, drilling and laboratory testing. Large salars can be assessed efficiently through various geophysical techniques. The thickness of the sediments in the salar can be assessed using gravity surveys due to the lower density of the sediments relative to basement rocks underlying the salar. Seismic techniques are useful in assessing the basement contact and the internal structure of the sediment package. Electrical techniques can help delineate the limits of the conductive brine bodies and to some extent the basement topography.

Drilling is the next logical step after surface sampling and geophysical work. Drilling provides information on lithium grade at depth but also importantly, it allows assessment of salar maturity, sediment composition, porosity and permeability. Sampling of brines at various depths will determine the extent of lithium grade variation and it can be achieved through bailer sampling or by pumping from specific intervals.

Drilling can be completed with diamond drilling, which provides the highest quality sample but with variable recovery. Sonic drilling provides the best sample but is the most expensive method. Aircore is fast and cheap, but sample quality is reduced. Rotary drilling is used to install production boreholes.
Pump testing from drill holes is the final step, to determine the longer-term performance, drawdown and grade.


In addition to lithium grade and quantity, other factors are important in determining the potential for commercial lithium production from a salar. The ratio of lithium to magnesium (Mg) and sulphate (SO4) is equally important as it impacts brine processing; low Mg and SO4 relative to Li is a favourable characteristic. Porosity and permeability is also of critical importance for production.

Brine chemistry is variable within the South American salars and has important implications for processing. The extremely large Salar de Uyuni in Bolivia has a lithium grade in excess of 400 mg/l, but the Mg/Li ratio is 18.6, which is three times higher than the smaller Salar de Atacama in Chile. As a result, the Bolivian example is unsuitable for conventional processing whereas the Chilean example is producing today.